The political dimension: Added value for cross-cultural analysis. Nozawa and Smits, two ceos and their public statements [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 91 (3):319-327 (2010)

Work-related cultural differences, which were familiarized by scholars such as Hall and Hofstede, offer important concepts to help us understand various forms of cooperation and communication. However, the predominant focus of cultural analysis on collectivistic harmony prevents us from gaining an understanding of strategy and conflict. In an attempt to grasp how conflicts are handled, a political analysis can provide new insights. This is illustrated by a comparative study of two CEOs who gave public statements concerning management failure: Shouhei Nozawa of Yamaichi and Paul Smits of KPN. Their statements were strikingly different in several ways, but the classical insights of cross-cultural analysis can only partly explain the differences. This is where political analysis comes in, focusing on interest relationships, responsibilities and virtues, tactics and strategy
Keywords cultural differences  political analysis  public statements  responsibility   makoto   spijt  CEO  Nozawa  Yamaichi  Smits  KPN
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0085-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,328
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Encounter with Enlightenment. A Study of Japanese Ethics.Robert E. Carter - 2001 - Albany: State University of New York Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #300,450 of 2,280,319 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #831,075 of 2,280,319 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature