Good work: its nature, its nurture

In Felicia A. Huppert, Nick Baylis & Barry Keverne (eds.), The Science of Well-Being. Oxford University Press. pp. 343--359 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good work: its nature, its nurture.Susan Verducci & Gardner & Howard - 2005 - In Felicia A. Huppert, Nick Baylis & Barry Keverne (eds.), The Science of Well-Being. Oxford University Press.
Are Measures of Well-Being Philosophically Adequate?Willem van der Deijl - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (3):209-234.
Der Durkheim‐Test. Anmerkungen zu Susan Leigh Stars Grenzobjekten.Sebastian Gießmann - 2015 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 38 (3):211-226.
Relationship with reality and its role in the well-being of young adults.Nick Baylis - 2005 - In Felicia A. Huppert, Nick Baylis & Barry Keverne (eds.), The Science of Well-Being. Oxford University Press. pp. 241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
16 (#934,061)

6 months
1 (#1,515,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan Verducci
San Jose State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references