Rene Von Schomberg
European Commission
On the basis of Karl-Otto Apels’ diagnosis of the shortcomings of philosophical ethics in general, and any ethics of individual accountability in particular, I give an outline how these shortcoming are currently to be articulated in the context of ecological crisis and socio-technical change. This will be followed with three interpretations of Karl-Otto Apels’ proposal for an ethics of collective coresponsibility. In conclusion, I will advocate that only a further social evolution of the systems of science, economy and law will enable a possible institutionalization of collective co-responsibility by means of a new innovation paradigm: responsible innovation.
Keywords discourse ethics  Karl-Otto Apel  responsible innovation  critical theory  ecological crisis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Karl-Otto Apel Y la crítica Del sentido.Gustavo Salerno - 2009 - Ideas Y Valores 58 (139):33-59.
Karl-Otto Apel: An Obituary.Piet Strydom - 2017 - European Journal of Social Theory 20 (4):569-575.
Karl-Otto Apel.Karl-Otto Apel - 2004 - In Gisela Riescher (ed.), Politische Theorie der Gegenwart in Einzeldarstellungen. Von Adorno Bis Young. Alfred Kröner Verlag. pp. 343--15.


Added to PP index

Total views
116 ( #93,791 of 2,455,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #31,521 of 2,455,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes