Reasonable Disagreement and Metaphysical Immodesty: A Comment on Talbott’s Which Rights Should be Universal?

Human Rights Review 9 (2):167-179 (2008)

Authors
Jeppe Platz
University of Richmond
Abstract
Talbott grounds human rights in a moral epistemology that supports metaphysical immodesty but requires epistemic modesty. Metaphysical immodesty provides prescriptive confidence, while epistemic modesty prevents moral imperialism. I offer some reasons for doubting that Talbott’s moral epistemology yields the desired result. Insofar as Talbott aims for a determinate conception of human rights that could serve as the backbone of a system of international law, Talbott must deal with issues of reasonable disagreement, and for these issues, epistemic modesty provides no guarantee against moral imperialism. In particular, I outline two sources of reasonable disagreement, that no social world is without loss and the complexity of the concept of autonomy, which illustrate how Talbott’s prescriptive confidence borders on moral imperialism
Keywords Human rights  Talbott  Autonomy  Reasonable disagreement
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12142-007-0037-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,000
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Which Rights Should Be Universal?William J. Talbott - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Human Rights and Human Well-Being.William Talbott - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights.W. J. Talbott - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):294-297.
Waldron on Law and Disagreement.T. Christiano - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):513-543.
Jeremy Waldron on Law and Disagreement.David Estlund - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 99 (1):111-128.
A Better, Dual Theory of Human Rights.Marcus Arvan - 2014 - Philosophical Forum 45 (1):17-47.
A Guarantee of Universal Salvation?Eric Reitan - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):413-432.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
9 ( #726,426 of 2,236,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #579,708 of 2,236,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature