The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes


Authors
Douglas Walton
University of Windsor
Abstract
The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,938
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Is Reasoning? What Is an Argument?Douglas N. Walton - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (8):399-419.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On a Razor's Edge: Evaluating Arguments From Expert Opinion.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):139-159.
Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?Christian Kock - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):91-108.
Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication.Carlo Martini - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):151-166.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Supporting Argumentation Schemes in Argumentative Dialogue Games.Simon Wells - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):171-191.
Story Similarity in Arguments From Analogy.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (2):190-221.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
11 ( #677,128 of 2,259,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #670,804 of 2,259,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature