Philosophical Studies 92 (3):307-319 (1998)

Authors
Ruth Weintraub
Tel Aviv University
Abstract
Comparisons between utilities pose a pressing problem if, while incapable of being grounded, they are required in ethical deliberation. My aim is to consider whether there are epistemological impediments to implementing such ethical choices. Can we find ourselves being persuaded of the ethical need to compare utilities of different individuals, yet unable to do so because the comparisons cannot be warranted? I argue that the problem cannot arise; no plausible moral principle will invoke magnitudes which are inscrutable.
Keywords utilities  comparisons
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1004203702557
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,496
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Truth and Probability.F. Ramsey - 1926 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. Routledge. pp. 52-94.
On Economic Inequality.Amartya Sen - 1997 - Clarendon Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Transcendental Arguments and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons.Mauro Rossi - 2011 - Economics and Philosophy 27 (3):273-295.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
40 ( #266,975 of 2,446,359 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #147,968 of 2,446,359 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes