The Hypothesis of Nash Equilibrium and Its Bayesian Justification

In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala: Papers From the 9th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 245--264 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How does Bayesian reasoning support participation in a game's Nash equilibrium? This paper provides an answer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paul Weirich.Bayesian Justification - 1994 - In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala: Papers From the 9th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 245.
Equilibrium in Nash´s mind.Vasil Penchev - 2020 - Philosophy of Action eJournal 13 (8):1-11.
The relevance of Nash equilibrium to psychiatric disorders.Tassos Patokos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):245-258.
An axiomatic analysis of the Nash equilibrium concept.Hannu Salonen - 1992 - Theory and Decision 33 (2):177-189.
What Is Rational About Nash Equilibria?Mathias Risse - 2000 - Synthese 124 (3):361-384.
Maximin play in completely mixed strategic games.Vitaly Pruzhansky - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (4):543-561.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
22 (#699,274)

6 months
8 (#505,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weirich
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references