From constants to consequence, and back

Synthese 187 (3):957-971 (2012)
Bolzano’s definition of consequence in effect associates with each set X of symbols (in a given interpreted language) a consequence relation X . We present this in a precise and abstract form, in particular studying minimal sets of symbols generating X . Then we present a method for going in the other direction: extracting from an arbitrary consequence relation its associated set C of constants. We show that this returns the expected logical constants from familiar consequence relations, and that, restricting attention to sets of symbols satisfying a strong minimality condition, there is an isomorphism between the set of strongly minimal sets of symbols and the set of corresponding consequence relations (both ordered under inclusion).
Keywords Logical constants  Consequence relations  Bolzano consequence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-9902-z
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,743
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Consequence Mining: Constans Versus Consequence Relations.Denis Bonnay & Dag Westerståhl - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (4):671-709.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

66 ( #80,476 of 2,178,038 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #54,939 of 2,178,038 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums