Science, scientists and history of science

History of Science 22 (4):421-424 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note comments on a recent paper by Reingold, itself a response to remarks by Gillispie at the 1981 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to the Comments of A. Shimony.L. Tisza - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:617 - 618.
Comments on Suppes' Paper: The Essential but Implicit Role of Modal Concepts in Science.Aldo Bressan - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:315 - 321.
The 'New' History of Science: Implications for Philosophy of Science.Rachel Laudan - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:476 - 481.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-25

Downloads
16 (#905,208)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Public Knowledge.John Ziman - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (2):222-224.
Science, Scientists, and Historians of Science.Nathan Reingold - 1981 - History of Science 19 (4):274-283.

Add more references