HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (2):703-728 (2020)

Abstract
Ingarden’s phenomenology of aesthetics is characterised primarily as a realist ontological approach which is secondarily concerned with acts of consciousness. This approach leads to a stark contrast between spatiotemporal objects and literary objects. Ontologically, the former is autonomous, totally determined, and in possession of infinite attributes, whilst the latter is a heteronomous intentional object that has only limited determinations and infinitely many “spots of indeterminacy.” Although spots of indeterminacy are often discussed, the role they play in contrasting the real and literary object is not often disputed. Through a close reading of Ingarden’s ontological works and texts on aesthetics, this essay contests the purity of Ingarden’s ontological approach and the ensuing disparity between real and literary object, particularly on the question of spots of indeterminacy. I do this by demonstrating the following five theses: 1) Ingarden’s claim that the real object has an infinitude of properties belies an epistemology, and we should instead conclude that ontologically the real object’s properties are finite. 2) Ingarden’s a priori argument that absent properties of real objects are ontologically determined is unsound. 3) The radical difference between the infinitude and finitude of givenness and absence of the real and the literary object ought to be relativised. 4) Indeterminacies within the novel are concretised in much the same way that absent properties of real objects are intended. 5) Literature makes claims that have a truth value that we can attribute to their author.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-2-703-728
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,863
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fiction and Metaphysics.Amie L. Thomasson - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Candide. Voltaire - 2006 - In Thomas L. Cooksey (ed.), Masterpieces of Philosophical Literature. Greenwood Press.
Perception.Kevin Mulligan - 1995 - In Barry Smith & David Woodruff Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press. pp. 168-238.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

O przedmiocie matematycznym.Piotr Błaszczyk - 2004 - Filozofia Nauki 2 (1):45-59.
Two Structures in One Object.Marek Piwowarczyk - 2020 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 97 (4):659-678.
Erwartungshorizont: Über eine literarische Hermeneutik, die Ingarden nie schrieb.Gerardo Arguelles-Fernandez - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (1):137-164.
Virtual Objects: Becoming Real.Bartolomiej Skowron - 2020 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 9 (2):619-639.
The Literary Work of Art. [REVIEW]F. B. C. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (3):555-557.
The Problem Of Creationism In The Realism-Idealism Controversy.Marek Rosiak - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 5 (2):107-114.
Ingarden’s Quasi-Judgment as Aesthetic Ontology.Augusta O. Gooch - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 1:93-97.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-24

Total views
4 ( #1,220,727 of 2,426,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #188,484 of 2,426,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes