Against posthumous rights

Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):186-199 (2010)
Abstract
A number of prominent nonconsequentialists support the thesis that we can wrong the dead by violating their moral claims. In contrast, this study suggests that the arguments offered by Thomson, Scanlon, Dworkin, Feinberg and others do not warrant posthumous rights because having claim-grounding interests requires an entity to have the capacity to experience significance. If dead people don't have this capacity, there is no reason to attribute claims to them. Raising doubts about prominent hypothetical examples of ‘no-effect injury’, the study concludes that nonconsequentialists should consider adopting an error theory regarding posthumous claims, and suggests two alternative explanations of the relevant moral domains
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00477.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,126
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Deletion as Second Death: The Moral Status of Digital Remains.Patrick Stokes - 2015 - Ethics and Information Technology 17 (4):237-248.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
More Comments on Rights and Claims.Andrew Halpin - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (3):271 - 310.
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Promises, Rights and Claims.David Alm - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (1):51-76.
Neo-Positivism About Rights the Problem with 'Rights as Enforceable Claims'.Saladin Meckled-Garcia - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):143–148.
Moral Rights: Conflicts and Valid Claims.Judith Wagner Decew - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 54 (1):63 - 86.
Posthumous Rights.Cecile Fabre - 2008 - In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Posthumous Harm.Steven Luper - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.
Desire Fulfillment and Posthumous Harm.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):27 - 38.
Harming the Dead.James Stacey Taylor - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:185-202.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-01-28

Total downloads

40 ( #129,904 of 2,171,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,615 of 2,171,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums