The Evolvability of Evolutionary Theories: A Reply to Denis Noble

Biosemiotics 14 (3):669-673 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this commentary on Denis Noble’s “The Illusions of the Modern Synthesis,” I discuss three illusions he argues exist within the Modern Synthesis. These illusions have the common theme of attempting to identify the correct way of understanding and describing biological systems. I agree with much of Noble’s claims, but offer the language of developmental systems theory as a friendly tool for moving the project forward.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is evolvability evolvable?Massimo Pigliucci - 2008 - Nature Reviews Genetics 9:75-82.
What Evolvability Really Is.Rachael L. Brown - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (3):axt014.
The Music of Life: Biology Beyond Genes.Denis Noble - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Evolution of evolvability.G. P. Wagner & J. Draghi - 2010 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Gerd Muller (eds.), Evolution – the Extended Synthesis. MIT Press. pp. 379--399.
Evolution without History?Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis - 2021 - Biosemiotics 14 (1):131-134.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
The Conceptualist View of Teleology.Denis Noble - 1967 - Analysis 28 (2):62 - 63.


Added to PP

15 (#951,094)

6 months
2 (#1,205,524)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew M. Winters
Yavapai College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references