Susan Haack on Twardowski's Refutation of the Relativity of Truth

Filozofia Nauki 19 (4) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper comments Susan Haack’s remarks about Twardowski’s criticism of relativism in the theory of truth. The author summarizes Twardowski’s arguments for truth-absolutism and tries to show that that their presentation by Haack is incomplete. The defense of Twardowski’s position in the paper uses ideas developed by Tarski and Kokoszyñska

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tarski on Definition, Meaning and Truth.Douglas Patterson - 2009 - In Sandra Lapointe, Jan Wolenski, Mathieu Marion & Wioletta Miskiewicz (eds.), The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy. Kaziemierz Twardowski’s philosophical legacy. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 16--155.
Overcoming Psychologism. Twardowski on Actions and Products.Denis Fisette - 2021 - In Arnaud Dewalque, Charlotte Gauvry & Sébastien Richard (eds.), Philosophy of Language in the Brentano School: Reassessing the Brentanian Legacy. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 189-205.
Is It True What Haack Says about Tarski?Richard C. Jennings - 1987 - Philosophy 62 (240):237 - 243.
Haack on Dummett: A note.Andrea M. Weisberger - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 55 (3):331.
Is it True What She Says About Tarski?Karl Popper - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (207):98-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jan Hertrich-Woleński
Jagiellonian University
Jan Wolenski
Jagiellonian University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references