Why the Confucians had no concept of race : Cultural difference, environment, and achievement

Philosophy Compass 14 (10):e12628 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that Confucianism had an antiessentialist conception of selfhood. This understanding of self means that they did not have, and could not have had, a concept of “race” in the sense that one's essence determines one's becoming. In the Confucian canon, the embodiment of cultural norms/performance of culturally appropriate actions defines one's human-ness. This account of human agency in becoming human can be seen in the Confucian explanation of moral failure. This assumption of human agency also means that the Confucian understanding of hierarchy is social as opposed to ontological and that differences between peoples are understood to be a result of culture–custom variation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-20

Downloads
21 (#173,985)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shuchen Xiang
Xidian University

References found in this work

The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):141-145.
A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology.John A. Dupre & Daniel J. Nicholson - 2018 - In Daniel J. Nicholson & John Dupré (eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Science and the Modern World.Alfred North Whitehead - 1925 - Humana Mente 1 (3):380-385.
The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1983 - Ethics 94 (1):153-155.
The philosophy of symbolic forms.Ernst Cassirer, Ralph Manheim & Charles W. Hendel - 1957 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 12 (4):399-399.

View all 20 references / Add more references