Sense in Epistemology of Social Science

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:109-115 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been recently a substantial rise of relativism in the epistemology of social science. It has seriously discredited normative function of the epistemology and changed the context of epistemological discussion. Some hold that the problem of relativism cannot be solved by scientific means, because it ultimately depends on personal beliefs. However, present paper shows that there are different scientific strategies of coping with relativism. The key argument is that the epistemological stance towards relativism is closely related to the conceptualization of sense in general social theory. Some prominent examples of socialtheorizing are presented to support this point and demonstrate that different conceptualizations of sense are possible, and that these are connected to the approach to social-scientific cognition. Relationship between epistemological grounds and conceptualization of sense in work of Scheler, Weber, Bourdieu, Luhmann is briefly analyzed. The conclusion is drawn that future exploration of epistemological problems in social sciences may benefit from rethinking and refining the concept of sense.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rationality and rehabilitation of relativism.Anatoliy Rakitov - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):76-91.
Epistemological Relativism: Nature and Problems.B. Richard Beatch - 1994 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Underdetermination of Knowledge by Context.Ilya Kasavin - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:121-125.
Should the Role of Epistemology in Studying Scientific Knowledge be Rethought?Mamchur Elena - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:117-120.
How Is Epistemology Possible?Alina Motycka - 2008 - Dialogue and Universalism 18 (1-3):101-105.
Kuhn’s Epistemological Relativism: An Interpretation and Defense.Gerald Doppelt - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):33 – 86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
31 (#532,577)

6 months
8 (#415,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references