Ein Vergleich dreier aussagenlogischer Semantiken

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (22):44-61 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we compare three different semantic theories for a propositional language, namely a valuation-semantic, a truth-set- semantic and a modal-set-semantic theory. We prove step by step that these semantic theories are mutually equivalent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ein Vergleich dreier aussagenlogischer Semantiken.Alexander Zimmermann - 2009 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):44-61.
Praktische Gründe. Ein Vergleich dreier paradigmatischer Theorien.Norbert P. Anwander - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (5):571-573.
Semantic Theory of Truth.Jan Woleński - 2019 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why semantic innocence?Graham Oppy - 1992 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (4):445 – 454.
The concept of truth and the semantics of the truth predicate.Kirk Ludwig & Emil Badici - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):622-638.
Semantic Pluralism.Emanuel Viebahn - 2018 - Frankfurt, Germany: Klostermann.
The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic.Hans Halvorson - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (3):475-478.
Truth in Semantics.Max Kölbel - 1981 - In Felicia Ackerman (ed.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 242–257.
Semantic Paradox and the Metaphysics of Truth.Leon Fairfield Porter - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Der Hauptsatz der Smullyanmengen.Alexander Zimmermann - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (23):24-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-03

Downloads
4 (#1,617,803)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references