Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Human/Non-Human Chimeras" by Robert Streiffer

This is an automatically generated and experimental page

If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.

This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.

References Cited

  • Basl, J., 2010, “State Neutralityand the Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies”, The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience, 1(2): 41–48. (Scholar)
  • Cohen, C., 2007, Renewing the Stuff of Life: Stem Cells, Ethics, and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Cole, A., 2013, “To Make Mice Smarter, Add a Few Human Brain Cells”, All Things Considered, National Public Radio, March 7, 2013, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • Comstock, G., 2000, Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case against Agricultural Biotechnology, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Cossins, D. 2013, “Mice Learn Faster with Human Glia”, The Scientist, March 7, 2013, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • Couly, G., Coltey, P., and Le Douarin, N., 1992, “The Developmental Fate of the Cephalic Mesoderm in Quail-Chick Chimeras”, Development, 114: 1–15. (Scholar)
  • Dancy, J. 1993, Moral Reasons, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Degeling, C, Irvine, R, and Kerridge, I., 2013, “Faith-based Perspectives on the Use of Chimeric Organisms for Medical Research”, Transgenic Research, 23(2): 265–269. (Scholar)
  • DeGrazia, D., 1996, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2007, “Human-Animal Chimeras: Human Dignity, Moral Status, and Species Prejudice”, Metaphilosophy, 38(2–3): 309–329. (Scholar)
  • Devine, P., 1978, The Ethics of Homicide, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
  • DiSilvestro, R., 2004, “A Neglected Solution to the Problem of the Metaphysical and Moral Status of the Human-Animal Chimera”, Ethics and Medicine, 20(2): 5-–23. (Scholar)
  • Eberl, J. and Ballard, R., 2009, “Metaphysical and Ethical Perspectives on Creating Animal-Human Chimeras”, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 34: 470–486. (Scholar)
  • Fehilly, C., Willadsen, S., and Tucker, E., 1984, “Interspecific Chimaerism between Sheep and Goat”, Nature, 307 (February 16): 634–636. (Scholar)
  • Feinberg, J., 1980, “Abortion”, in Matters of Life and Death, 2d ed., ed., T. Regan, 256–93, New York: Random House. (Scholar)
  • Fost, N., 2006, “The Great Stem Cell Debate: Where Are We Now? Cloning, Chimeras, and Cash”, Wisconsin Medical Journal, 105(4): 16–17. (Scholar)
  • Francione, G., 1995, Animals, Property, and the Law, Philadelphia: Temple University Press. (Scholar)
  • Geron Ethics Advisory Board (EAB), 1999, “Research with Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Ethical Considerations”, Hastings Center Report, 29 (2): 30–36. (Scholar)
  • Goldstein, R., Drukker, M., Reubinoff, B., and Benvenisty, N., 2002, “Integration and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Transplanted to the Chick Embryo”, Developmental Dynamics, 225: 80–86. (Scholar)
  • Han, X., Chen, M., Wang, F., Windrem, M., Wang, S., Shanz, S., Xu, Q., Oberheim, N., Bekar, L., Betstadt, S. Silva, A., Takana, T., Goldman, S. and Nedergaard, M., 2013, “Forebrain Engraftment by Human Glial Progenitor Cells Enhances Synaptic Plasticity and Learning in Adult Mice”, Cell Stem Cell, 12: 342–353. (Scholar)
  • Harman, E., 2003, “The Potentiality Problem”, Philosophical Studies, 114: 173–198. (Scholar)
  • Heathcotte, B., and Robert, J., 2006, “The Strange Case of the Humanzee Patent Quest”, The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 6(1): 51–60. (Scholar)
  • Humane Society of the United States, 2009, “Farm Animal Statistics: Slaughter Total”, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • Hyun, I., Taylor, P., Testa, G., Dickens, B., Jung, K. W., McNab, A., Robertson, J., Skene, L., and Zoloth, L., 2007, “Ethical Standards for Human-to-Animal Chimera Experiments in Stem Cell Research”, Cell Stem Cell, 1(2): 159–163. (Scholar)
  • Institute of Medicine (IOM), 1996, Xenotransplantation: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (Scholar)
  • International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR), 2006, “Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research”, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • James, D., Noggle, S., Swigut, T., and Brivanlou, A., 2006, “Contribution of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Mouse Blastocysts”, Developmental Biology, 295: 90–102. (Scholar)
  • Johnston, J., and Eliot, C., 2003, “Chimeras and ”Human Dignity“”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3): W6–W8. (Scholar)
  • Kamm, F. M., 2006, Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
  • Karpowicz, P., Cohen, C., and van der Kooy, D., 2004, “Is It Ethical to Transplant Human Stem Cells into Nonhuman Embryos” Nature Medicine, 10(4): 331–335. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “Developing Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and BoundariesKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15(2): 107–134. (Scholar)
  • Kass, L., 1998, “The Wisdom of Repugnance: Why We Should Ban the Cloning of Humans”, Valparaiso University Law Review, 32(2): 679–705. (Scholar)
  • Kittay, E., 2005, “At the Margins of Moral Personhood”, Ethics, 116 (October): 100–131. (Scholar)
  • Macklin, R., 2003, “Dignity Is a Useless Concept”, British Medical Journal, 327 (20–27 December): 1419–1420. (Scholar)
  • Mill, J. S., 1958 [1847],“Nature”, in J. S. Mill (ed.), Nature and Utility of Religion, The Liberal Arts Press, New York: 3–44. Originally published in J. S. Mill, 1847, Nature, The Utility of Religion, and Theism, Being Three Essays on Religion, London. (Scholar)
  • Mill, J. S., 1979 [1861], Utilitarianism, ed. George Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. (Scholar)
  • Muotri, A., Nakashima, K., Toni, N., Sandler, V., and Gage, F., 2005, “Development of Functional Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Neurons in Mouse Brain”, The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(51): 18644–18648. (Scholar)
  • Nagy, A., and Rossant, J., 2001, “Chimaeras and Mosaics for Dissecting Complex Mutant Phenotypes”, International Journal of Development Biology, 45: 577–582. (Scholar)
  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS), 2005, Committee on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (Scholar)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH), 1994, Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel, vol. I, Bethesda, Md.: National Institutes of Health. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2001, Stem Cells: Scientific Progress and Future Research Directions, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • Noonan, J., 1970, The Morality of Abortion, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), 1987, New Developments in Biotechnology. Background Paper: Public Perceptions of Biotechnology, OTA-BP-BA-45, Washington: GPO. (Scholar)
  • Ogle., B., Butters, K., Plummer, T., Ring, K., Knudsen, B. Lizow, M. Cascalho, M. and Platt, J. 2004. “Spontaneous Fusion of Cells between Species Yields Transdifferentiation and Retroviral Transfer”, The FASEB (Federation of American Societies for American Biology) Journal, 18 (March): 548–550. (Scholar)
  • Parfit, D., 1984, Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
  • Polzin, V., Anderson, D. Anderson, G. BonDurant, R., Butler, J., Pashen, R., Penedo, M., and Rowe, N., 1987, “Production of Sheep-Goat Chimeas by Inner Cell Mass Transplantation”, Journal of Animal Science, 65: 325–330. (Scholar)
  • Pratt, M., 2001, “Scanlon on Promising”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 14(1): 143–158. (Scholar)
  • Rabin, S, 2006, “The Human Use of Humanoid Beings: Chimeras and Patent Law”, Nature Biotechnology, 24(5): 517–519. (Scholar)
  • Regan, T., 1978, “Fox's Critique of Animal Liberation”, Ethics, 88: 126–133. (Scholar)
  • Robert, J., and Baylis, F., 2003, “Crossing Species Boundaries”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3): 1–13. (Scholar)
  • Rollin, B., 2003, “Ethics and Species Integrity”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3): 15–17. (Scholar) (Scholar)
  • Scanlon, T., 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. (Scholar)
  • Schwarz, S., 1990, The Moral Question of Abortion, Chicago: Loyola University Press. (Scholar)
  • Scully, M., 2002, Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy, New York: St. Martin's Press. (Scholar)
  • Shreeve, J., 2005, “The Other Stem-Cell Debate”, The New York Times Magazine, 10: 42–47. (Scholar)
  • Siegel, A., 2003, “The Moral Insignificance of Crossing Species Boundaries”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3): 33–34. (Scholar)
  • Stanković, B., 2005, “Patenting the Minotaur”, Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, 12(2): 1–39. (Scholar)
  • Streiffer, R., 2003, “In Defense of the Moral Relevance of Species Boundaries”, The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(3): 37–38. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2005, “At the Edge of Humanity: Human Stem Cells, Chimeras, and Moral Status”, The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15(4): 347–370. (Scholar)
  • –––, 2010, “Chimeras, Moral Status, and Public Policy: Implications of the Abortion Debate for Public Policy on Human/Nonhuman Chimera Research”, The Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 38(2): 238–250. (Scholar)
  • Tang, Y., Shimizu, E., Dube, G., Rampon, C., Kerchner, G., Zhuo, M., Liu, G, and Tsien, J., 1999, “Genetic Enhancement of Learning and Memory in Mice”, Nature, 401(September): 63–69. (Scholar)
  • Thompson, P., 2000, “Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: Incorporating Ethical Considerations,” prepared for The Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • Thomson, J. J., 1987, “Ruminations on an Account of Personal Identity,” in On Being and Saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright, ed., J. J. Thomson, 215–40, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1990, The Realm of Rights, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
  • –––, 1997, “People and their Bodies”, in Reading Parfit, ed. J. Dancy, 202–229, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. (Scholar)
  • Thomson, J., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S., Waknitz M., Swiergiel, J., Marshall, V., and Jones, J., 1998, “Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts”, Science, 282(6 November), 1145–1147. (Scholar)
  • University of Wisconsin, Biotechnology Advisory Committee, 2001, “Second Report of the Bioethics Advisory Committee on Human Stem Cell Research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison”, [Available online]. (Scholar)
  • VanDeVeer, D., 1979, “Interspecific Justice”, Inquiry, 22: 55–79. (Scholar)
  • Wertheimer, A., 1996, Exploitation, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
  • Zhang, S., Wernig, M., Duncan, I., Brüstle, O., and Thomson, J., 2001, “In Vitro Differentiation of Transplantable Neural Precursors from Human Embryonic Stem Cells”, Nature Biotechnology, 19(December): 1129–1133. (Scholar)
  • Zylstra, E., 2012, “Presumed Sapient: A Proposed Test for the Constitutional Personhood and Patentability of Human-Animal Chimeras and Hybrids”, University of San Francisco Law Review, 46: 1075–1124. (Scholar)

Other References

Generated Sun Aug 20 06:46:27 2017