Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Some Metacomplete Relevant Modal Logics.Takahiro Seki - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1115-1141.
    A logic is called metacomplete if formulas that are true in a certain preferred interpretation of that logic are theorems in its metalogic. In the area of relevant logics, metacompleteness is used to prove primeness, consistency, the admissibility of γ and so on. This paper discusses metacompleteness and its applications to a wider class of modal logics based on contractionless relevant logics and their neighbours using Slaney’s metavaluational technique.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Metacompleteness of Substructural Logics.Takahiro Seki - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (6):1175-1199.
    Metacompleteness is used to prove properties such as the disjunction property and the existence property in the area of relevant logics. On the other hand, the disjunction property of several basic propositional substructural logics over FL has been proved using the cut elimination theorem of sequent calculi and algebraic characterization. The present paper shows that Meyer’s metavaluational technique and Slaney’s metavaluational technique can be applied to basic predicate intuitionistic substructural logics and basic predicate involutive substructural logics, respectively. As a corollary (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A free IPC is a natural logic: Strong completeness for some intuitionistic free logics.Carl J. Posy - 1982 - Topoi 1 (1-2):30-43.
    IPC, the intuitionistic predicate calculus, has the property(i) Vc(A c /x) xA.Furthermore, for certain important , IPC has the converse property (ii) xA Vc(A c /x). (i) may be given up in various ways, corresponding to different philosophic intuitions and yielding different systems of intuitionistic free logic. The present paper proves the strong completeness of several of these with respect to Kripke style semantics. It also shows that giving up (i) need not force us to abandon the analogue of (ii).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations