Graduate studies at Western
Studies in Christian Ethics 18 (1):15-31 (2005)
|Abstract||In 2002, then Cambridge student Joanna Jepson initiated a legal, ecclesial, and media conversation on selective termination for disability. Making herself available in a way that is vulnerable, palpable, and effective, Jepson has used subtle rhetorical skill to question the ways certain lives are appraised as precious or expendable. The now Revd Jepson’s witness may adumbrate a boundary past which the task of truly public bioethics becomes precarious. While ethicists may persuasively argue in the public square against positive eugenics — against selectively breeding or genetically enhancing conception — opposition to negative eugenics — against the elimination of ‘unfit’ lives — stretches the bounds of apologetics. The theological bioethicist may be called to gesture toward the Whence? and the Whither?, even if the purveyors of public bioethics find this an objectionable undertaking|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Wilkinson (2010). On the Distinction Between Positive and Negative Eugenics. In Matti Häyry (ed.), Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics. Rodopi.
Stephen Wilkinson (2007). Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409 - 418.
Robert Sparrow (2011). Liberalism and Eugenics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta (2007). Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Jorge J. E. Gracia (2001). Philosophy in American Public Life. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:129-140.
Wade Roberts (unknown). Autonomy, Pluralism and the Future of the Species: Agar and Habermas on Liberal Eugenics. :153-167.
Floris Tomasini (2007). Imagining Human Enhancement: Whose Future, Which Rationality? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):497-507.
Tomasz Sahaj (2006). XIX- i XX-wieczna eugenika społeczna w ujęciu historyczno-filozoficznym. Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 50.
Wade Roberts (2006). Autonomy, Pluralism and the Future of the Species. Social Philosophy Today 22:153-167.
Bernard G. Prusak (2005). Rethinking "Liberal Eugenics": Reflections and Questions on Habermas on Bioethics. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):31-42.
Joanna Zylinska (2009). Is There Life in Cybernetics? : Designing a Post-Humanist Bioethics. In Rosi Braidotti, Claire Colebrook & Patrick Hanafin (eds.), Deleuze and Law: Forensic Futures. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gregory B. Turner, G. Stephen Taylor & Mark F. Hartley (1995). Ethics, Gratuities, and Professionalization of the Purchasing Function. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (9):751 - 760.
Gregory K. Pike (2010). What 'Really' Is Eugenics? Bioethics Research Notes 22 (4):47.
Jonathan Sinclair Carey (1987). Empathy and the Expert Witness. Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (1):19-25.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads6 ( #154,981 of 739,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?