Chimeras and imaginary objects: A study in the post-medieval theory of signification
Vivarium 15 (1):57-77 (1977)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Brisart (2012). True Objects and Fulfilments Under Assumption in the Young Husserl. Axiomathes 22 (1):75-89.
Rachel A. Ankeny (2003). No Real Categories, Only Chimeras and Illusions: The Interplay Between Morality and Science in Debates Over Embryonic Chimeras. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):31-33.
Peter Inwagen (2002). “Carnap” and “the Polish Logician”. Acta Analytica 17 (1):7-17.
Harjeet Singh Gill (2001). Signification in Buddhist and French Traditions. Harman Pub. House.
Caroline Guibet Lafaye (2006). Arts postmodernes, philosophie du langage et phénoménologie. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:407-424.
Ivo Thomas (1971). Book Review:Probability and Opinion. A Study in the Medieval Presuppositions of Post-Medieval Theories of Probability Edmund F. Byrne. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 38 (4):616-.
E. J. Ashworth (1985). Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics. Variorum Reprints.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #64,434 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
