Can Science Change our Notion of Existence?

ProtoSociology 28:201-211 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I explore the question of whether scientific changes can induce mutations in our ordinary notion of existence. I conclude that they can’t, partially on the grounds that some of the pro­posed alternative-notions of existence are only terminologically-distinct from our ordinary notion, and so don’t provide genuine metaphysical alternatives, and partially on the grounds that the ordinary notion of existence is criterion-transcendent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notes toward an analysis of conceptual change.Mark Bevir - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (1):55 – 63.
Existence, presupposition and anaphoric space.Andrea Bonomi - 1977 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):239 - 267.
Personality.F. B. Jevons - 1913 - New York,: Routledge.
Logic and Non-Existence.Czesław Lejewski - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25 (1):209-234.
Becoming: Temporal, Absolute, and Atemporal.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2014 - In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), Debates in the Metaphysics of Time. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 87-107.
Some logics of iterated belief change.John Cantwell - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (1):49-84.
Thomas Kuhn on the existence of the world.Michel Ghins - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):265 – 279.
Philosophy of Change Management.S. K. Singh - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:157-163.
Existence Predicates.Friederike Moltmann - 2020 - Synthese 197 (1):311-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
5 (#1,534,828)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jody Azzouni
Tufts University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references