At least some electrophysiological and behavioural data cannot be reconciled with the planning–control model
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-25 (2004)
The planning/control distinction is an important tool in the study of sensorimotor transformations. However, published data from our laboratories suggest that, contrary to what is predicted by the proposed model, (1) structures in the superior parietal lobe of both monkeys and humans can be involved in movement planning; and (2) fast pointing actions can be immune to visual illusions even if they are performed without visual feedback. The planning–control model as proposed by Glover is almost certainly too schematic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Judy S. DeLoache (2004). Scale Errors by Very Young Children: A Dissociation Between Action Planning and Control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):32-33.
Scott Glover (2004). Planning and Control in Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):57-69.
Maurizio Gentilucci & Sergio Chieffi (2004). How Are Cognition and Movement Control Related to Each Other? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):36-37.
Charles E. Wright & Charles Chubb (2004). Planning Differences for Chromaticity- and Luminance-Defined Stimuli: A Possible Problem for Glover's Planning–Control Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):55-56.
Yann Coello & Yves Rossetti (2004). Planning and Controlling Action in a Structured Environment: Visual Illusion Without Dorsal Stream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):29-31.
Scott Glover (2004). Separate Visual Representations in the Planning and Control of Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
James G. Phillips, Thomas J. Triggs & James W. Meehan (2004). Planning and Control of Action as Solutions to an Independence of Visual Mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):46-47.
David A. Westwood (2004). Planning, Control, and the Illusion of Explanation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):54-55.
Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget (2004). Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
Jos J. Adam & Ron F. Keulen (2004). FMRI Evidence for and Behavioral Evidence Against the Planning–Control Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-24.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #467,866 of 1,168,018 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,193 of 1,168,018 )
How can I increase my downloads?