Should we essentially ignore the role of stimuli in a general account of operant selection?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):528-529 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The selectionist account of behavior is actually a focused discussion of operant selection. To this end, the authors essentially exclude stimuli from their analysis. This exclusion is inconsistent with the importance placed on environmental interaction in their general account. Further, this exclusion limits the generality of their account by missing important sources of stimulus-elicited behavior (e.g., classical conditioning).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selection in operant learning may fit a general model.Julian C. Leslie - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):542-543.
Is operant selectionism coherent?François Tonneau & Michel B. C. Sokolowski - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):558-559.
Do operant behaviors replicate?Todd Grantham - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):538-539.
Operant conditioning and teleology.Douglas V. Porpora - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):568-582.
“Which processes are selection processes?”.Samir Okasha - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):548-549.
On the origins of complexity.Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#1,191,137)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references