AI and the conquest of complexity in law
Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):159-180 (2004)
| Abstract | The paper identifies some of the problems with legal systems and outlines the potential of AI technology for overcoming them. For expository purposes, this outline is based on a simplified epistemology of the primary functions of law. Social and philosophical impediments from the side of the legal community to taking advantage of the potential of this technology are discussed and strategic recommendations are given. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMarc Lauritsen (1992). Technology Report: Building Legal Practice Systems with Today's Commercial Authoring Tools. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):87-102.
Hendrik Gommer (2012). The Biological Essence of Law. Ratio Juris 25 (1):59-84.
F. S. C. Northrop (1959). The Complexity of Legal and Ethical Experience. Boston, Little, Brown.
Theodore M. Benditt (1978). Law as Rule and Principle: Problems of Legal Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
Antonio-Enrique Perez Luño (1987). Aproximación al Derecho de la Informática. Theoria 3 (1-2):529-551.
Antonio-Enrique Perez Luño (1987). Aproximación Al Derecho de la Informática. Theoria 3 (1):529-551.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
