Feminist Art Epistemologies: Understanding Feminist Art

Hypatia 21 (3):166 - 189 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist art epistemologies (FAEs) greatly aid the understanding of feminist art, particularly when they serve to illuminate the hidden meanings of an artist's intent. The success of parodic imagery produced by feminist artists (feminist visual parodies, FVPs) necessarily depends upon a viewer's recognition of the original work of art created by a male artist and the realization of the parodist's intent to ridicule and satirize. As Brand shows in this essay, such recognition and realization constitute the knowledge of a well-(in)formed FAE. Without it, misinterpretation is possible and viewers fail to experience and enjoy a full and rewarding encounter with a provocative and subversive work of art

Similar books and articles

On the Virtues and Plausibility of Feminist Epistemologies.Pieranna Garavaso & Nicla Vassallo - 2003 - Epistemologia, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Della Scienza (1):99-131.
Feminist epistemologies.Linda Alcoff & Elizabeth Potter (eds.) - 1993 - New York: Routledge.
Feminist epistemologies and women's lives.Lorraine Code - 2006 - In Kittay Eva Feder & Martín Alcoff Linda (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 211–234.
Placebound: Australian feminist geographies.Louise C. Johnson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Jackie Huggins & Jane M. Jacobs.
Global Bioethics and Feminist Epistemology.Jane Duran - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):303-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,832 (#2,653)

6 months
245 (#9,982)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peg Brand Weiser
University of Oregon

Citations of this work

The Role of Luck in Originality and Creativity.Peg Zeglin Brand Weiser - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (1):31-55.
Parody.Peg Zeglin Brand Weiser - 2014 - In Michael Kelly (ed.), Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press. pp. 69-72.

Add more citations