Fichte: The Self and the Calling of Philosophy, 1762-1799 (review) [Book Review]

Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):268-270 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Journal of the History of Philosophy 40.2 (2002) 268-270 [Access article in PDF] Book Review Fichte: The Self and the Calling of Philosophy, 1762-1799 Anthony J. La Vopa. Fichte: The Self and the Calling of Philosophy, 1762-1799. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Pp. xiv + 449. Cloth, $54.95. Few philosophers have led more dramatic lives than J. G. Fichte, whose serendipitous ascent from rural poverty to academic celebrity was only the beginning of a career filled with conflict and punctuated by moments of public triumph and failure. Though Fichte's philosophical writings are among the most abstract and difficult in the history of modern philosophy, it is nevertheless possible to observe certain parallels between his technical "philosophy of striving" and his personal striving to establish himself financially and professionally, [End Page 268] to win an audience for his thought, and, above all, to have an effect upon his age. The links between Fichte's "times," career, and philosophy are the topic of Anthony La Vopa's fine new study of the first thirty-eight years of the philosopher's life. La Vopa is a historian, not a philosopher, and he has little to say about the specific details and originality of Fichte's philosophical contributions, and what he does say on this subject--for example, his claim that one of Fichte's advances over Kant was to assign the productive imagination a central role in cognition, or his assertion that Fichte collapsed the Kantian distinction between willing and cognizing--often betrays a certain naiveté on his part and an unfamiliarity with the specifically philosophical context of Fichte's project.Though La Vopa is not interested in the complex details of the foundational portion of Fichte's system and has nothing to say about the important evolution of the same during Fichte's tenure at Jena, he is quite concerned with Fichte's social, legal, and economic theories, as articulated in the Grundlage des Naturrechts and the ClosedCommercial State (despite the fact that the latter work really falls outside the "Jena period"), and he provides a detailed and enlightening account of Fichte's eccentric labor-based neo-mercantilism and its relationship to other economic theories. Even here, though, La Vopa is less interested in Fichte's own ideas than in the relation of the same to his life and the relation of both his life and his thought to larger intellectual and social currents. It is in this spirit that he attempts to show, for example, that Fichte's strategy of grounding both theoretical and practical reason upon an analysis of the "pure I" is best understood as a continuation of the "subjective turn" characteristic of Protestantism as a whole and that his Sisyphean efforts to create a Publikum for his philosophy were deeply rooted in the Protestant conception of a "calling."The aim of this volume, according to its author, is to "contextualize Fichte's construal of selfhood" and to view his thought through eighteenth-century lenses, rather than through "the distorting lenses of modern ideologies." La Vopa thus interprets the development of Fichte's thought as "a series of moments in the secularization of Lutheranism," a project that he finds most clearly expressed in Fichte's vision of spiritual regeneration and in his uncompromising moral rigor. This experiment in historical contextualization largely avoids the kind of anti-philosophical reductionism common to such efforts, and La Vopa never claims to have "explained" Fichte's philosophy simply by placing it so squarely in the context of its age. On the contrary, he displays a fine sensitivity to questions concerning the relationship between history and philosophy, and he wisely leaves it to his readers to judge for themselves the philosophical value of his enterprise. As an intellectual biography, this book is reliable, expertly informed, and genuinely readable. Any philosopher interested in early post-Kantianism will learn a great deal from La Vopa's account of the larger intellectual, social, economic, and political landscape of the period. To take but two examples: La Vopa's detailed discussion of...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Editorial note.Charles Capper - 2013 - Modern Intellectual History 10 (3):515-517.
New essays on Fichte's later Jena Wissenschaftslehre.Daniel Breazeale & Tom Rockmore (eds.) - 2002 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Fichte's fictions revisited.Benjamin D. Crowe - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):268 – 287.
Fichte’s Ethical Thought by Allen W. Wood.Caroline A. Buchanan & Daniel Breazeale - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):170-171.
The Atheism Controversy of 1799 and the Christology of Fichte's Anweisung zum seligen Leben of 1806.George J. Seidel - 1996 - In Tom Rockmore & Daniel Breazeale (eds.), New perspectives on Fichte. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press. pp. 143--151.
After Jena: New Essays on Fichte's Later Philosophy.Tom Rockmore & Daniel Breazeale (eds.) - 2008 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Criticisme et chose en soi chez Kant et Fichte.Maria Hotes - 2012 - Horizon Sociologique 6:01-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
39 (#407,668)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Breazeale
University of Kentucky

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references