Arsehole aristocracy

European Journal of Political Theory 17 (4):391-410 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The 18th-century French political theorist the Baron de Montesquieu described honour as the ‘principle’ – or animating force – of a well-functioning monarchy, which he thought the appropriate regime type for an economically unequal society extended over a broad territory. Existing literature often presents this honour in terms of lofty ambition, the desire for preference and distinction, a spring for political agency or a spur to the most admirable kind of conduct in public life and the performance of great deeds. Perhaps so. But it also seems to involve quite a bit of what the contemporary philosopher Aaron James calls ‘being an asshole’, and the article will explore what happens to Montesquieu’s political theory of monarchy – which is foundational for an understanding of modern politics – when we reverse the usual perspective and consider it through the lens of the arsehole aristocracy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mediocrity versus meritocracy: Nietzsche's (mis)reading of Chamfort.R. Abbey - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (3):457-483.
Rawls and Natural Aristocracy.Matthew Clayton - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):239-259.
From Meritocracy to Aristocracy: Towards a Just Society for the 'Great Man'.Naoko Saito - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):95-109.
The Meaning of Aristocracy in Aristotle's Political Thought.Liz Anne Alexander - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-19

Downloads
44 (#358,513)

6 months
8 (#351,349)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Taking back control.Robert Jubb - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (2):159-180.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
On Human Conduct.David Copp - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (2):235.
There is no such thing as ideal theory.Jacob T. Levy - 2016 - Social Philosophy and Policy 33 (1-2):312-333.

View all 11 references / Add more references