Metaphysics for an Enlightened Public: The Controversy over Monads in Germany, 1746–1748

Isis 103 (1):1-23 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay analyzes the controversy that attended the prize essay question on monads proposed by the Berlin Academy of Sciences in 1746. The controversy was first touched off by an anonymous pamphlet published by the mathematician Leonhard Euler, the academy's most well known member, that attacked the doctrine of monads. It peaked with the awarding of the prize to Johann Heinrich Gottlob Justi, whose winning essay closely followed Euler's arguments. This essay discusses the controversy as one instance in a broader quarrel in the German academic community over the suitability of Christian Wolff's philosophy as the foundation for a broad range of academic disciplines, including natural philosophy. It also analyzes the controversy as displaying the central role of the periodical press in the emergent German public sphere.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leibniz's Monad and Mulla Sadra's Hierarchy of Being.Ali Fathtaheri - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:93-100.
Reflections on public bioethics: A view from the trenches.Leon Kass - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):221-250.
No Gaps, No God?Teed Rockwell - 2009 - Philosophy and Theology 21 (1-2):129-153.
The Frege-Hilbert Controversy.Patricia Blanchette - 2007 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
9 (#1,275,915)

6 months
1 (#1,507,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?