David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The European Legacy 15 (5):583-598 (2011)
Until the publication of the Dialectic of Enlightenment it was possible to place the controversy regarding myth in the framework of the general rivalry between enlightenment and rationalism on the one hand and Romanticism on the other. However, Horkheimer and Adorno's joint work rendered this controversy irrelevant and anachronistic. This essay presents this theoretical shift by analyzing the conceptual problems it raises. The basic question addressed is whether in our poststrucuralist and postmodernist age the distinction between critical and mythical thought is still possible and appropriate. I believe that our answer to this question has fundamental significance for our personal and public life, and as such also determines the role and meaning of our current philosophical discourse
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kathryn A. Morgan (2000). Myth and Philosophy From the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge University Press.
Nigel Tubbs, Hegel and the Dialectic of Enlightenment : The Recognition of Education in Civil Society.
Aviva Geva (2001). Myth and Ethics in Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (4):575-597.
Bernice Glatzer Rosenthal (2004). Losev's Development of Themes From Nietzsche's the Birth of Tragedy. Studies in East European Thought 56 (2-3):187-209.
Hauke Brunkhorst (2000). Enlightenment of Rationality: Remarks on Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Constellations 7 (1):133-140.
Marianna Papastephanou (2000). Ulysses' Reason, Nobody's Fault: Reason, Subjectivity and the Critique of Enlightenment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):47-59.
Alfredo Lucero-Montano (2006). Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophy Pathways 114.
Ursula Renz (2011). From Philosophy to Criticism of Myth: Cassirer's Concept of Myth. Synthese 179 (1):135 - 152.
Max Horkheimer (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-20
Total downloads33 ( #59,867 of 1,413,380 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,380 )
How can I increase my downloads?