“Applied Science”: A Phrase in Search of a Meaning

Isis 103 (3):537-545 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The term “applied science,” as it came to be popularly used in the 1870s, was a hybrid of three earlier concepts. The phrase “applied science” itself had been coined by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1817, translating the German Kantian term “angewandte Wissenschaft.” It was popularized through the Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, which was structured on principles inherited from Coleridge and edited by men with sympathetic views. Their concept of empirical as opposed to a priori science was hybridized with an earlier English concept of “practical science” and with “science applied to the arts,” adopted from the French. Charles Dupin had favored the latter concept and promoted it in the reconstruction of the Conservatoire Nationale des Arts et Métiers. The process of hybridization took place from the 1850s, in the wake of the Great Exhibition, as a new technocratic government favored scientific education. “Applied science” subsequently was used as the epistemic basis for technical education and the formation of new colleges in the 1870s.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Art to Applied Science.Eric Schatzberg - 2012 - Isis 103 (3):555-563.
The Category of "applied Science": An Analysis of Its Justification from "information Science" As Design Science.Antonio Bereijo - 2012 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):327-350.
Applying Science and Applied Science: What’s the Difference?Margaret Morrison - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):81 – 91.
Basic Research as a Political Symbol.Roger Pielke - 2012 - Minerva 50 (3):339-361.
Embodied Odysseys: Relics of stories about journeys through past, present, and future.Robert Bud - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):639-642.
Applied Philosophy.Sami Pihlström - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):121-133.
Values in pure and applied science.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):257-268.
Pure science and the problem of progress.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:55-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
15 (#953,629)

6 months
3 (#984,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Pure science and the problem of progress.Heather Douglas - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 46:55-63.
A Historical Perspective on the Distinction Between Basic and Applied Science.Nils Roll-Hansen - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (4):535-551.
Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy.Jamie Shaw - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (4):477-499.
Managing the future: The Special Virus Leukemia Program and the acceleration of biomedical research.Robin Wolfe Scheffler - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48 (PB):231-249.
How to Characterise Pure and Applied Science.Aboutorab Yaghmaie - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):133-149.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations