The Subjectivity of Time

Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The commonsense understanding of time typically has the following characteristics: time appears to flow, perceived and objective rates of temporal passage may differ, time and change are related, and the past is fixed , the present fleeting, and the future open. I call this the "pre-theoretic understanding of time." This dissertation compares the pre-theoretic understanding with a number of philosophical theories that attempt to explain temporal perception and temporal language. I argue that once philosophical considerations are taken into account, any plausible theory of time will differ significantly from the pre-theoretic conception. ;I begin with an examination of David Hume's and Immanuel Kant's treatment of the composition problem which arises when attempting to explain how temporally separated perceptions can be related so as to form a unified experience. I argue that Hume's empiricist approach is unable to explain this problem, making way for Kant's transcendental idealist solution. A successful theory of time must incorporate Kant's insight that time cannot be attributed to objects independent of any subject. Time at the transcendental level must be ideal. ;Next, I examine John McTaggart's argument that 'past', 'present', and 'future' cannot be consistently attributed to events, thus making time unreal, I reject McTaggart's position, because it requires the pre-theoretic understanding to be a deception. I examine two positions that were developed in response to McTaggart: the A-theory, which explains time through temporal becoming, and the B-theory, which explains time through temporal relations. I reject the A-theory because its rejection of modern relativity theory is too great a sacrifice to make in order to retain the pre-theoretic notion of temporal flow. The position is found to be philosophically and scientifically unacceptable. I conclude that the B-theory of time, though it requires significant modification of the pre-theoretic view, is the best approach towards developing a successful temporal theory. ;Finally, I sketch the direction for a successful temporal theory, which blends Kant's transcendental idealism and the B-theory. I conclude that the pre-theoretic view of temporal flow must be reinterpreted and the view of an open future must be abandoned.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A new problem for the A-theory of time.Simon Prosser - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):494-498.
On McTaggart's Theory of Time.Edward Freeman - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (4):389-401.
Time, tense, truth.Katalin Farkas - 2008 - Synthese 160 (2):269 - 284.
Leibniz's non-tensed theory of time.Michael J. Futch - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):125 – 139.
The reality of now.William Seager - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):69 – 82.
Time, Unity, and Conscious Experience.Michal Klincewicz - 2013 - Dissertation, Cuny Graduate Center
Objective time flow.Storrs McCall - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (3):337-362.
Time and the Transience of Temporal Reality.Marcello Oreste Fiocco - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
aquinas On Eternity, Tense, And Temporal Becoming.Andrew Brenner - 2010 - Florida Philosophical Review 10 (1):16-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references