Alternative Interpretations of Love in Kierkegaard and Royce

Journal of Religious Ethics 10 (2):238 - 263 (1982)
This essay analyzes two diverse interpretations of Christian love in the writings of Søren Kierkegaard and Josiah Royce. Through the comparison of these two positions, I attempt to show not only the embeddedness of a conception of love in an entire theological vision but its usefulness as a lens for examining that position. I argue that Kierkegaard's interpretation of love tends to foster social inequality, a tendency rooted in his basic ontology. The Roycean view of love, resting upon a radically different ontology, avoids such problematic ethical implications.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/40017770
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,661
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Graham M. Smith (2007). Kierkegaard: Responsibility to the Other. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (2):181-197.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Stephen N. Dunning (1995). Love Is Not Enough. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):22-39.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #377,318 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.