¿Fue Darwin el Newton de la brizna de hierba?

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):53-79 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ratifying Haeckel and contradicting Kant’s negative prophesy, in this paper I try to show that Darwin was, really, the Newton of the blade of grass. Darwin showed how the configurations according to goals of the living beings, could be explained from a naturalistic point of view, without having to postulate the existence of an intentional agent that had arranged or prearranged then. This achievement, nevertheless, was obtained by a way that Kant could not foresee and that Haeckel could not understand: Darwin came there showing that there was more natural science than that Newton, Kant and Haeckel could conceive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

¿Fue Darwin el Newton de la brizna de hierba?Gustavo Caponi - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):53-79.
The Concept of Evolution.A. R. Manser - 1965 - Philosophy 40 (151):18 - 34.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea. [REVIEW]Larry Vandervert - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (3):333-338.
El ruiseñor de Darwin.Gustavo Caponi - 2004 - Revista de Filosofia Aurora 16 (19):51-55.
Darwin was a teleologist.James G. Lennox - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):409-421.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
14 (#985,798)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gustavo Caponi
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references