Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Herman Cappelen investigates how language and other representational devices can go wrong, and how to fix them. We use language to understand and talk about the world, but what if our language has deficiencies that prevent it from playing that role? How can we revise our concepts, and what are the limits on revision?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Philosophers Shouldn’t Do Semantics.Herman Cappelen - 2017 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (4):743-762.
No conceptual thought without language.Christopher Gauker - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):687-687.
The limits of language.Stephen David Ross - 1994 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Thinking in Words: Language as an Embodied Medium of Thought.Guy Dove - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (3):371-389.
Cappelen, Content Relativism, and the “Creative Interpreter”.Mark Criley - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):211-219.
A model of conceptual analysis.Gal Yehezkel - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (5):668-687.
Context-fixing semantics for the language of action.P. Suppes & C. Crangle - 1988 - In J. Dancy, J. M. E. Moravcsik & C. C. W. Taylor (eds.), Human Agency: Language, Duty, and Value : Philosophical Essays in Honor of J.O. Urmson. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press. pp. 47--76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-19

Downloads
374 (#52,884)

6 months
65 (#72,907)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Herman Cappelen
University of Hong Kong

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references