Cognitive Model of Trust Dynamics Predicts Human Behavior within and between Two Games of Strategic Interaction with Computerized Confederate Agents

, &
Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00049

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Is the Model of Trust for Multi-agent Systems? Whether or Not E-Trust Applies to Autonomous Agents.Massimo Durante - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):347-366.
Strategic Network Formation, Games on Networks, and Trust.Werner Raub, Vincenz Frey & Vincent Buskens - 2014 - Analyse & Kritik 36 (1):135-152.
Interaction context theory: The interdependence and mutual exclusivity of observation and action.W. F. Lawless - 1996 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):141-161.
Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction.Johan van Benthem - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Developing artificial agents worthy of trust: “Would you buy a used car from this artificial agent?”. [REVIEW]F. S. Grodzinsky, K. W. Miller & M. J. Wolf - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (1):17-27.
Is epistemic trust of veritistic value?Gregor Betz, Michael Baurmann & Rainer Cramm - 2013 - Ethics and Politics 15 (2):25-41.
Interaction and resistance: The recognition of intentions in new human-computer interaction.Vincent C. Müller - 2011 - In Anna Esposito, Antonietta M. Esposito, Raffaele Martone, Vincent C. Müller & Gaetano Scarpetta (eds.), Towards autonomous, adaptive, and context-aware multimodal interfaces: Theoretical and practical issues. Springer. pp. 1-7.
Evolutionary dynamics and equitable core selection in assignment games.Heinrich H. Nax & Bary S. R. Pradelski - unknown
What Does God Know? Supernatural Agents' Access to Socially Strategic and Non-Strategic Information.Benjamin G. Purzycki, Daniel N. Finkel, John Shaver, Nathan Wales, Adam B. Cohen & Richard Sosis - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (5):846-869.
The interrogative model of inquiry meets dynamic epistemic logics.Yacin Hamami - 2015 - Synthese 192 (6):1609-1642.
Trust and multi-agent systems: applying the diffuse, default model of trust to experiments involving artificial agents. [REVIEW]Jeff Buechner & Herman T. Tavani - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (1):39-51.
Modeling inference of mental states: As simple as possible, as complex as necessary.Ben Meijering, Niels A. Taatgen, Hedderik van Rijn & Rineke Verbrugge - 2014 - Interaction Studies 15 (3):455-477.
Levels of Trust in the Context of Machine Ethics.Herman T. Tavani - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (1):75-90.
Coalitional Interval Games for Strategic Games in Which Players Cooperate.Luisa Carpente, Balbina Casas-Méndez, Ignacio García-Jurado & Anne van den Nouweland - 2008 - Theory and Decision 65 (3):253-269.
Agent connectedness and backward induction.Christian W. Bach & Conrad Heilmann - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
85 (#199,316)

6 months
79 (#61,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references