"The Real Point Is Control": The Reception of Barbara McClintock's Controlling Elements [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):133 - 162 (1999)
|Abstract||In the standard narrative of her life, Barbara McClintock discovered genetic transposition in the 1940s but no one believed her. She was ignored until molecular biologists of the 1970s "rediscovered" transposition and vindicated her heretical discovery. New archival documents, as well as interviews and close reading of published papers, belie this narrative. Transposition was accepted immediately by both maize and bacterial geneticists. Maize geneticists confirmed it repeatedly in the early 1950s and by the late 1950s it was considered a classic discovery. But for McClintock, movable elements were part of an elaborate system of genetic control that she hypothesized to explain development and differentiation. This theory was highly speculative and was not widely accepted, even by those who had discovered transposition independently. When Jacob and Monod presented their alternative model for gene regulation, the operon, her controller argument was discarded as incorrect. Transposition, however, was soon discovered in microorganisms and by the late 1970s was recognized as a phenomenon of biomedical importance. For McClintock, the award of the 1983 Nobel Prize to her for the discovery of movable genetic elements, long treated as a legitimation, may well have been bittersweet. This new look at McClintock's experiments and theory has implications for the intellectual history of biology, the social history of American genetics, and McClintock's role in the historiography of women in science.|
|Keywords||McClintock Barbara maize corn genetics transposable elements controlling elements gene expression regulation women scientists development|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Carla Keirns (1999). Seeing Patterns: Models, Visual Evidence and Pictorial Communication in the Work of Barbara McClintock. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):163 - 196.
J. Nash (1999). Freaks of Nature: Images of Barbara McClintock. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 30 (1):21-43.
Jay McDaniel (1986). Christian Spirituality as Openness Toward Fellow Creatures. Environmental Ethics 8 (1):33-46.
San MacColl (1990). Universality and Difference: O'Keeffe and McClintock. Hypatia 5 (2):149 - 157.
C. R. Grontkowski (1985). Book Review:A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock Evelyn Fox Keller. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (2):323-.
Henriette Kelker (1996). A Feeling for the Future: The Process of Change as Explored by Fred. L. Polak and Barbara McClintock. Zygon 31 (2):365-376.
Thomas McClintock (1969). 'Real' and Excluders. Analysis 30 (1):16 - 22.
Thomas McClintock (1971). The Egoist's Psychological Argument. American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1):79 - 85.
Masanori Kaji (2003). Mendeleev's Discovery of the Periodic Law: The Origin and the Reception. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 5 (3):189-214.
T. L. McClintock (1963). The Argument for Ethical Relativism From the Diversity of Morals. The Monist 47 (4):528-544.
Thomas McClintock (1971). Skepticism About Basic Moral Principles. Metaphilosophy 2 (2):150–157.
Thomas McClintock (1971). The Basic Varieties of Ethical Skepticism. Metaphilosophy 2 (1):29–43.
Thomas McClintock (1994). The Meaning of Hobbes's Egoistic Moral Philosophy. Philosophia 23 (1-4):247-263.
Thomas McClintock (1971). Relativism and Affective Reaction Theories. Journal of Value Inquiry 5 (2):90-104.
Frank Moss & P. V. E. McClintock (eds.) (1988). Noise in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?