A Note on List's Modal Logic of Republican Freedom

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):341-349 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note, I show how Christian List's modal logic of republican freedom (as published in this journal in 2006) can be extended (1) to grasp the differences between liberal freedom (noninterference) and republican freedom (non-domination) in terms of two purely logical axioms and (2) to cover a more recent definition of republican freedom in terms of `arbitrary interference' that gains popularity in the literature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Republican freedom and the rule of law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.
Republican freedom, rights, and the coalition problem.Keith Dowding - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):301-322.
Slaves, Prisoners, and Republican Freedom.Fabian Wendt - 2011 - Res Publica 17 (2):175-192.
Freedom in the market.Philip Pettit - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):131-149.
Liberal and republican conceptions of freedom.Charles Larmore - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119.
Republicanism and democratic injustice.Henry S. Richardson - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
Discourse theory and republican freedom.Philip Pettit - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#206,626)

6 months
7 (#417,242)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Boudewijn de Bruin
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Republican freedom and the rule of law.Christian List - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):201-220.

Add more references