Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||John Locke offered what he considered a sound a priori argument that Mind must come first, must be the original Cause, not merely an Effect: If, then, there must be something eternal, let us see what sort of Being it must be. And to that it is very obvious to Reason, that it must necessarily be a cogitative Being. For it is as impossible to conceive that ever bare incogitative Matter should produce a thinking intelligent Being, as that nothing should of itself produce Matter. Let us suppose any parcel of Matter eternal, great or small, we shall find it, in itself, able to produce nothing. . . . . Matter then, by its own strength, cannot produce in itself so much as Motion: the Motion it has, must also be from Eternity, or else be produced, and added to Matter by some other Being more powerful than Matter. . . . But let us suppose Motion eternal too: yet Matter, incogitative Matter and Motion, whatever changes it might produce of Figure and Bulk, could never produce Thought: Knowledge will still be as far beyond the power of Motion and Matter to produce, as Matter is beyond the power of nothing or nonentity to produce. And I appeal to everyone's own thoughts, whether he cannot as easily conceive Matter produced by nothing, as Thought produced by pure Matter, when before there was no such thing as Thought, or an intelligent Being existing. . . . So if we will suppose nothing first, or eternal: Matter can never begin to be: If we suppose bare Matter, without Motion, eternal: Motion can never being to be: If we suppose only Matter and Motion first, or eternal: Thought can never begin to be. For it is impossible to conceive that Matter either with or without Motion could have originally in and from itself Sense, Perception and Knowledge, as is evident from hence, that then Sense, Perception, and Knowledge must be a property eternally inseparable from Matter and every particle of it.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jay McDaniel (1983). Physical Matter as Creative and Sentient. Environmental Ethics 5 (4):291-317.
Henry Laycock (1989). Matter and Objecthood Disentangled. Dialogue 28 (01):17-.
David J. Furley (1976). Aristotle and the Atomists on Motion in a Void. In Peter K. Machamer & Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Ohio State University Press.
Trevor Ponech (2006). External Realism About Cinematic Motion. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):349-368.
Howard Duncan (1984). Inertia, the Communication of Motion, and Kant's Third Law of Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 51 (1):93-119.
Stephen Gaukroger (2000). The Role of Matter Theory in Baconian and Cartesian Cosmologies. Perspectives on Science 8 (3):201-222.
Michael Fuller (ed.) (2010). Matter and Meaning: Is Matter Sacred or Profane? Cambridge Scholars.
H. J. Blumenthal (1990). Matter, Space and Motion Richard Sorabji: Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. Pp. X + 377. London: Duckworth, 1988. £35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (01):72-73.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,305 of 751,827 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 751,827 )
How can I increase my downloads?