S social science : foundations 1 pluralist economics: is it scientific?

In Samuel Decker, Wolfram Elsner & Svenja Flechtner (eds.), Advancing pluralism in teaching economics: international perspectives on a textbook science. New York: Routledge (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pluralist economics.Edward Fullbrook (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Distributed in the USA exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan.
Science and social control: the institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918-1947.Malcolm Rutherford - 2010 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):47.
Science, economics, 'vision'.Susan Haack - 2004 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 71 (2):223-234.
What is economics for?Brendan Hogan - 2021 - In Peter Róna, László Zsolnai & Agnieszka Wincewicz-Price (eds.), Words, Objects and Events in Economics: The Making of Economic Theory. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Why economics textbooks must, and how they can, be changed into a real-world and pluralist economics : the example of a fundamentally new complexity-economics micro-textbook.Wolfram Elsner - 2019 - In Samuel Decker, Wolfram Elsner & Svenja Flechtner (eds.), Advancing pluralism in teaching economics: international perspectives on a textbook science. New York: Routledge.
Suggestion for Teaching Science as a Pluralist Enterprise.Antonino Drago - 2018 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 5:66-83.
Frank Knight's 'categories' and the definition of economics.John Hart - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (3):290-307.
On the Foundations of Social Science Research.Dennis C. Mueller - 1992 - Analyse & Kritik 14 (2):195-220.
A pragmatist defense of non-relativistic explanatory pluralism in history and social science.Jeroen van Bouwel & Erik Weber - 2008 - History and Theory 47 (2):168–182.
Scientific Misconduct and Research Ethics in Economics.Altug Yalcintas & Wible James R. - 2016 - Review of Social Economy 74 (1):1-6.
Social Scientific Naturalism Revisited.Daniel M. Hausman - 2018 - In Peter Rona & Laszlo Zsolnai (eds.), Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics. Springer Verlag. pp. 71-83.
Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research.Harold Kincaid - 1995 - Cambridge University Press.
Realism from the 'lands of Kaleva': an interview with Uskali Mäki.Uskali Mäki - 2008 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 1 (1):124.
The Programming Approach and the Demise of Economics: Volume I: A Revival of Myrdal, Frisch, Tinbergen, Johansen and Leontief.Franco Archibugi - 2019 - Springer Verlag.
Michael Polanyi and his generation: origins of the social construction of science.Mary Jo Nye - 2011 - London: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references