Balancing Protection and Inclusion by Including More Non-Scientist and Nonaffiliated Members on IRBs

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):116-118 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the primary mandate for institutional review boards (IRBs) to protect potential participants from harm, the egregious history of research abuses, and the fact that there is no mention of incl...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

IRBs and Industry Sponsors: Clash of Priorities.Jacquelyn Harootunian-Cutts - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):122-124.
Balancing Uncertain Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research.Richard Barke - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (3):337-364.
The Nuts and Bolts of IRBs.Don Workman - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (2).
Views and Experiences of IRBs Concerning Research Integrity.Robert Klitzman - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):513-528.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-25

Downloads
13 (#1,036,918)

6 months
5 (#639,345)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ellie Anderson
Pomona College