Evidence, Theory, and Interpretation: The “New Atheism” and the Philosophy of Science

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1):178-188 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Undermining the case for evidential atheism.Paul K. Moser - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):83 - 93.
Evidence: philosophy of science meets medicine.John Worrall - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):356-362.
Reply to Professor Brinton.Clement Dore - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (1):91 - 92.
Renaissance and Reformation.Denis J.-J. Robichaud - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 179.
Atheism and the rise of science.Taner Edis - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 398.
Atheism and science.Peter Atkins - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 124-136.
New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1):142-153.
Prediction and prejudice.Peter Lipton - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):51 – 65.
Agnosticism.Clement Dore - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (4):503 - 507.
The defense of atheism.Brenda Watson - 2014 - Think 13 (37):19-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
17 (#888,423)

6 months
3 (#1,027,592)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alister McGrath
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references