Technology and morality: Influences on public attitudes toward biotechnology

, &
Knowledge, Technology & Policy 13 (1):43-57 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s12130-000-1003-0

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Balance Between Expertise and Authority in Citizen Engagement About New Biotechnology.David Castle - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):1-13.
Impact of education on the attitudes of college students toward biotechnology.L. G. Sterling, C. K. Halbrendt & S. L. Kitto - 1993 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (1):75-88.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
The ethics of agri-food biotechnology : how can an agricultural technology be so important?Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Tailor-made biotechnologies: Possibilities for farmer-centered development. [REVIEW]Guido Ruivenkamp - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):26-30.
Animal Futures : Public Attitudes and Sensibilities Towards Animals and Biotechnology on Contemporary Britain.Philip Macnaghten - 2001 - Ieppp Report for the Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology Commission.
Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: A UK study. [REVIEW]Paul Sparks, Richard Shepherd & Lynn J. Frewer - 1994 - Agriculture and Human Values 11 (1):19-28.
Science, politics, and morality: scientific uncertainty and decision making.René von Schomberg (ed.) - 1993 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Biotechnology, nanotechnology, media, and public opinion.Susanna Priest - 2008 - In Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.), What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos. Elsevier/Academic Press.
Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States. [REVIEW]Benjamin M. Cole & Preeta M. Banerjee - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):555-574.
Ideology and agricultural technology in the late twentieth century: Biotechnology as symbol and substance. [REVIEW]Frederick H. Buttel - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (2):5-15.
Globalization and Public Attitudes towards the State in the Asia-Pacific Region.Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, Po-san Wan & Timothy Ka-Ying Wong - 2010 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 11 (1):21-49.
Assumptions of the Deficit Model Type of Thinking: Ignorance, Attitudes, and Science Communication in the Debate on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture. [REVIEW]Marko Ahteensuu - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):295-313.
Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
23 (#680,480)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case against bGH.Gary Comstock - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):36-52.
Genetically engineered herbicide resistance, part one.Gary Comstock - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2 (4):263-306.
Popularizing Biotechnology: The Influence of Issue Definition.L. Christopher Plein - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (4):474-490.

View all 11 references / Add more references