Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative? DOUGLAS W. PORTMORE

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2) (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can an act-consequentialist theory be agent relative?Douglas Portmore - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):363-77.
Agent-Relative vs. Agent-Neutral.Douglas W. Portmore - 2022 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley.
Consequentializing Commonsense Morality.Douglas W. Portmore - manuscript
Agent Neutrality is the Exclusive Feature of Consequentialism.Desheng Zong - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):676-693.
Agent-Neutral and Agent-Relative.Douglas W. Portmore - 2013 - In J. E. Crimmins & D. C. Long (eds.), Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism. Bloomsbury Academic.
McNaughton and Rawling on the Agent-Relative/Agent-Neutral Distinction.Douglas Portmore - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (3):350-356.
Conditional and Conditioned Reasons.David McNaughton & Piers Rawling - 2002 - Utilitas 14 (2):240.
Relativity of value and the consequentialist umbrella.Jennie Louise - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):518–536.
Can consequentialism be reconciled with our common-sense moral intuitions?Douglas W. Portmore - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 91 (1):1-19.
Combining teleological ethics with evaluator relativism: A promising result.Douglas W. Portmore - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):95–113.
Position‐relative consequentialism, agent‐centered options, and supererogation.Douglas W. Portmore - 2003 - Ethics 113 (2):303-332.
Consequentializing.Douglas W. Portmore - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (2):329-347.
Agent-neutral deontology.Tom Dougherty - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):527-537.
Not so promising after all: Evaluator-relative teleology and common-sense morality.Mark Schroeder - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-18

Downloads
23 (#679,329)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references