Animal Models in Neuropsychiatry: Do the benefits outweigh the moral costs?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):530-535 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal models have long been used to investigate human mental disorders, including depression, anxiety, and schizophrenia. This practice is usually justified in terms of the benefits (to humans) outweighing the costs (to the animals). I argue on utility maximization grounds that we should phase out animal models in neuropsychiatric research. Our leading theories of how human minds and behavior evolved invoke sociocultural factors whose relation to nonhuman minds, societies, and behavior has not been homologized. Thus it is not at all clear that we are gaining the epistemic or clinical benefits we want from this animal-based research.

Similar books and articles

Util-izing animals.Hugh Lafollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
Utilā€izing Animals.Niall Shanks Hugh Lafollette - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):13-25.
No Room at the Zoo: Management Euthanasia and Animal Welfare.Heather Browning - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (4):483-498.
Evaluating Animal Models: Some Taxonomic Worries.C. Degeling & J. Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):91-106.
Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research.Elisa Galgut - 2015 - Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):5-19,.
The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-26

Downloads
244 (#81,117)

6 months
116 (#33,679)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carrie Figdor
University of Iowa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references