Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal: the Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate: Oxford University Press, 2016. Hardcover €64,32. 320 pp

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):1095-1098 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10677-017-9833-y

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal: the Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate: Oxford University Press, 2016. Hardcover €64,32. 320 pp.Lily Eva Frank - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):1095-1098.
Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C.A.J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal : The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate: Oxford University Press, 2016, 320 pp, $74, ISBN: 978-0-19-875485-5. [REVIEW]Hilary Yancey - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (5):397-401.
Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal (eds.), The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate, Oxford University Press, 2016, 269pp. [REVIEW]Stephen M. Campbell & Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2017.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate.Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate.Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
The Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (4):233-243.
Book Review: Julian Savulescu, Ingmar Persson, Unfit for the Future. The Need for Moral Enhancement, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012; Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu et al. (a cura di), The Ethics of Human Enhancement. Understanding the Debate, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016. [REVIEW]Luca Lo Sapio - 2017 - Scienza E Filosofia 17:275–290.
Buchanan and the Conservative Argument against Human Enhancement from Biological and Social Harmony.Steve Clarke - 2016 - In Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, Tony Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal (eds.), The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 211-224.
Stop Wishing. Start Doing!: Motivational Enhancement Is Already in Use.Alberto Giubilini & Steve Clarke - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (1):29-31.
Human Enhancement Ethics: The State of the Debate.Nick Bostrom & Julian Savulescu - 2009 - In . Oxford University Press. pp. 1--22.
Guest Editorial: Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: Problems and Perspectives.Alberto Giubilini & Julian Savulescu - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (1):3-5.
Bioethics and Human Enhancement: an Interview with Julian Savulescu.Julian Savulescu - 2010 - Dilemata 3.
The moral obligation to be vaccinated: utilitarianism, contractualism, and collective easy rescue.Alberto Giubilini, Thomas Douglas & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (4):547-560.
Teaching and Learning Guide for: the Ethics of Human Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (6):424-426.
A Debate about Moral Enhancement.John Harris & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):8-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
25 (#627,632)

6 months
12 (#207,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lily Frank
Eindhoven University of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement.John Danaher - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (9):611-618.

Add more references