David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 48 (3):232 – 248 (2005)
In a recent paper, Eckart Förster challenges interpreters to explain why in the first Critique practical reason has a canon but no dialectic, whereas in the second Critique, there is not only a dialectic, but an antinomy of practical reason. In the Groundwork, Kant claims that there is a natural dialectic with respect to morality (4:405), a different claim from those advanced in the first and second Critiques. Förster's challenge may therefore be reformulated as the problem of explaining why practical reason has a canon in the first Critique, a dialectic in the Groundwork, and an antinomy in the second Critique. In this paper, I answer this challenge. I argue that these differences are due to the different aims and scope of the works, and in particular, the different place of the inclinations in their arguments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maria Borges (2007). Emotions and Practical Reason in Kant. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:161-166.
Annamaria Schiaparelli (2009). Plotinus on Dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Victoria S. Wike (1987). Kant on Happiness. Philosophy Research Archives 13:79-90.
Lara Ostaric (2009). Kant's Account of Nature's Systematicity and the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Inquiry 52 (2):155 – 178.
Eric Watkins (2010). The Antinomy of Practical Reason: Reason, the Unconditioned and the Highest Good. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas R. Flynn (2011). Sartre, Foucault and the Critique of (Dialectical) Reason. Sartre Studies International 16 (2):17-35.
Jonathan Francis Bennett (1974). Kant's Dialectic. New York]Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence Pasternack (2011). Regulative Principles and ‘the Wise Author of Nature’. Religious Studies 47 (4):411-429.
Frederick Rauscher (2010). The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #68,133 of 1,140,199 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #142,694 of 1,140,199 )
How can I increase my downloads?