- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Speech Acts
In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 58–66 (2010)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Speech Acts, Acts of Speech, and Performatives Acts and Their Contents Speech Acts, What is Said, and Speaker Meaning Misfires, Abuses, and How Saying Makes It So Illocutions, Perlocutions, and Implicature Direct and Indirect Speech Acts References Further reading.Author's Profile
speech acts ‐ topics in the philosophy of language Searle's dictum, with the assumption that speech acts are kinds of act speech acts, acts of speech and performatives ‘speech act,’ referring to a certain subset of the set of all acts ‐ that can be performed by, or in, saying that you are doing so acts and their contents ‐ common sense distinguishing between acts and their consequences speech acts, what is said, and speaker meaning misfires, abuses, and how saying makes it so ‐ Austin's treatment of what he called infelicities illocutions, perlocutions, and implicature direct and indirect speech acts conversational implicature, depending on communicative intentions
My notes
Similar books and articles
Speech Acts and Performatives.Jennifer Hornsby - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Are There Any Subsentential Speech Acts?Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska - 2017 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 29:248-271.
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish - 1979 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
The rhetorical relations approach to indirect speech acts.Lenny Clapp - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (1):43-76.
The rhetorical relations approach to indirect speech acts: Problems and prospects. [REVIEW]Lenny Clapp - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (1):43-76.
Illokutionäre Akte und Konventionalität.Friedrich Christoph Dörge - 2000 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 60 (1):125-150.
Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives.Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.
Speech and Morality: On the Metaethical Implications of Speaking. [REVIEW]James Mahon - 2016 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 5.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
17 (#854,714)
6 months
13 (#186,332)
2023-06-15
Downloads
17 (#854,714)
6 months
13 (#186,332)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions.Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):233-265.
Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach.Kees van Berkel & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2023 - Topoi 42 (2):509-525.
On the logical form and ontology of inferences in conversational implicatures.Denis Perrin - 2021 - Semiotica 2021 (240):285-315.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-nx2x8 uwo