On the oppression of women and animals
Environmental Ethics 18 (4):441-444 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Lisa H. Schwartzman (2007). Can Liberalism Account for Women's “Adaptive Preferences”? Social Philosophy Today 23:175-186.
Mark H. Bernstein (2004). Without a Tear: Our Tragic Relationship with Animals. University of Illinois Press.
Carol A. Chetkovich (2004). Women's Agency in a Context of Oppression: Assessing Strategies for Personal Action and Public Policy. Hypatia 19 (4):120-141.
Martha E. Gimenez (2005). Capitalism and the Oppression of Women: Marx Revisited. Science and Society 69 (1):11 - 32.
Beth A. Dixon (1996). The Feminist Connection Between Women and Animals. Environmental Ethics 18 (2):181-194.
Douglas Kellner (1993). Bartky, Domination, and the Subject. Hypatia 8 (1):145 - 152.
Chris Crittenden (1998). Subordinate and Oppressive Conceptual Frameworks: A Defense of Ecofeminist Perspectives. Environmental Ethics 20 (3):247-263.
Cathryn Bailey (2005). On the Backs of Animals: The Valorization of Reason in Contemporary Animal Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):1-17.
Claudia Card (1998). Radicalesbianfeminist Theory. Hypatia 13 (1):206 - 213.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #123,218 of 549,546 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,546 )How can I increase my downloads? |

