David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):268-269 (1998)
An alternative account of the locus equation phenomenon based on recent theories of speech movement planning is provided. It is similar to Sussman et al.'s account in positing that our productions are tuned to satisfy auditory constraints. It differs by suggesting that the locus equation effect may be an epiphenomenon of a planning process that satisfies simpler auditory constraints.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Keith R. Kluender (1998). Locus Equations Reveal Learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):273-274.
Richard E. Pastore & Edward J. Crawley (1998). Locus Equation: Assumption and Dependencies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):278-279.
Li Deng (1998). Locus Equation and Hidden Parameters of Speech. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):263-264.
Harvey M. Sussman, David Fruchter, Jon Hilbert & Joseph Sirosh (1998). Human Speech: A Tinkerer's Delight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):287-295.
Sheila E. Blumstein (1998). The Mapping From Acoustic Structure to the Phonetic Categories of Speech: The Invariance Problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):260-260.
Lawrence Brancazio (1998). Does Locus-Equation Linearity Really Matter in Consonant Perception? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):261-261.
Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget (2004). Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
Björn Lindblom (1998). An Articulatory Perspective on the Locus Equation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):274-275.
Ignatius G. Mattingly (1998). Why Did Coarticulation Evolve? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):275-276.
René Carré (1998). Linear Correlates in the Speech Signal: Consequences of the Specific Use of an Acoustic Tube? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):261-262.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #413,149 of 1,692,749 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,248 of 1,692,749 )
How can I increase my downloads?