Why Bertrand's Paradox is not paradoxical but is felt so

In U. Maki, S. Ruphy & G. Schurz (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science. Springer (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defusing Bertrand’s Paradox.Zalán Gyenis & Miklós Rédei - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):349-373.
Paradox and Psychotherapy.Gary Wayne Maryman - 1990 - Dissertation, Spalding University
The liar: What paradox? [REVIEW]Avrum Stroll - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (1):63-75.
The two-envelope paradox.Michael Clark & Nicholas Shackel - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):415--442.
Symmetry and Paradox.Stephen Read - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):307-318.
Reasoning from paradox.Laureano Luna - 2011 - The Reasoner 5 (2):22-23.
Paradox and Mystery in Theology.Bruce P. Baugus - 2013 - Heythrop Journal 54 (2):238-251.
A cognitive neuroscience, dual-systems approach to the sorites paradox.Leib Litman & Mark Zelcer - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):355-366.
A bayesian paradox.Ruth Weintraub - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):51-66.
A resolution of Bertrand's paradox.Louis Marinoff - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-22

Downloads
43 (#369,570)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Miklós Rédei
London School of Economics
Zalan Gyenis
Jagiellonian University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references